Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NOLAN, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by AKIYAMA, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 15, No. 1, 111-127 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986299015001008

An Analysis of Factors that Affect Law Enforcement Participation in Hate Crime Reporting

JAMES J. NOLAN

Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation

YOSHIO AKIYAMA

Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation

This study examines the social forces that affect law enforcement participation in hate crime data collection initiatives. Focused interviews were conducted in a stratified sample of police officers from various departments in 2 East Coast states. The findings from these interviews were used to create a survey instrument that was distributed to a sample of police officers and civilian employees in 4 police agencies, 1 from each region of the United States: Northeast, West, South, and Central. The survey findings reduced to 60 interrelated variables identified at the focus groups to 10 common factors (or constructs). These factors are: (a) organizational attitudes/beliefs; (b) utility in community relations; (c) organizational self-preservation; (d) efficacy of police involvement; (e) priority of resource allocations; (f) supportive organizational policies and practices; (g) individual attitudes/beliefs; (h) professional self-preservation; (i) work-related difficulties; and (j) organizational commitment. The results of this study provide valuable insight into ways to improve law enforcement participation in hate crime reporting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
S. W. Cronin, J. McDevitt, A. Farrell, and J. J. Nolan III
Bias-Crime Reporting: Organizational Responses to Ambiguity, Uncertainty, and Infrequency in Eight Police Departments
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2007; 51(2): 213 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
D. P. Haider-Markel
Perception and Misperception in Urban Criminal Justice Policy: The Case of Hate Crime
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2004; 39(4): 491 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. J. NOLAN III, Y. AKIYAMA, and S. BERHANU
The Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990: Developing a Method for Measuring the Occurrence of Hate Violence
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2002; 46(1): 136 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
K. FRANKLIN
Good Intentions: The Enforcement of Hate Crime Penalty-Enhancement Statutes
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2002; 46(1): 154 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Police QuarterlyHome page
S. E. Martin
Police and the Production of Hate Crimes: Continuity and Change in One Jurisdiction
Police Quarterly, December 1, 1999; 2(4): 417 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]