Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DUNBAR, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Defending the Indefensible

A Critique and Analysis of Psycholegal Defense Arguments of Hate Crime Perpetrators

EDWARD DUNBAR

University of California, Los Angeles

Hate crimes are a recently defined special class of violence or threat of violence to a person, property, and/or community. These crimes include a prominent symbolic component that affects a class of victimized parties, and provides an understanding of the motives of the perpetrator. Given the critical importance of intent in committing a hate crime, it is not surprising that defense attorneys have sought out counterarguments based on psychological theory to limit the perpetrator's culpability and achieve leniency. These defense strategies are considered in terms of their veracity vis-à-vis available behavioral research. The implications of these defense strategies are considered in terms of how psychological research may be employed in prosecution and pre-sentencing decision making concerning perpetrator placement.

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 15, No. 1, 64-77 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986299015001005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. A. Saucier, J. M. Hockett, and A. S. Wallenberg
The Impact of Racial Slurs and Racism on the Perceptions and Punishment of Violent Crime
J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2008; 23(5): 685 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. A. Saucier, T. L. Brown, R. C. Mitchell, and A. J. Cawman
Effects of Victims' Characteristics on Attitudes Toward Hate Crimes
J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2006; 21(7): 890 - 909.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
P. B. Gerstenfeld
Juror Decision Making in Hate Crime Cases
Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2003; 14(2): 193 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]