Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EGGER, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 15, No. 3, 242-261 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986299015003003
© 1999 SAGE Publications

Psychological Profiling

Past, Present, and Future

STEVEN A. EGGER

University of Illinois at Springfield

The development of psychological profiling is examined from its use during World War II to its use today in criminal investigation. This historical analysis includes Dr. James Brussels's work on the Mad Bomber and the "Boston Strangler" cases and then highlights three important dates in the development of psychological profiling: 1972, 1985, and 1994. This first date is when the Federal Bureau of Investigation began its pioneer development in psychological profiling. The second (1985) was psychologist Dr. David Canter's assistance to local police in England in the "Railway Rapist" case. And the third was the establishment of the first academic graduate degree program in investigative psychology by Dr. Canter at the University of Liverpool. Current profiling efforts include a discussion of the assumptions and goals of profiling and how the process of profiling is completed. Various critiques and evaluations of profiling are summarized. The future of profiling discusses issues of profiler licensing, standardizing the process, public versus private profilers, and profiling as an art or a science. New profiling techniques such as greater use of the computer in the profiling process and the decoding of narrative documents are included.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
E. Beauregard and B. Leclerc
An Application of the Rational Choice Approach to the Offending Process of Sex Offenders: A Closer Look at the Decision-making
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2007; 19(2): 115 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
B. Snook, J. Eastwood, P. Gendreau, C. Goggin, and R. M. Cullen
Taking Stock of Criminal Profiling: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2007; 34(4): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
J. DeFronzo, A. Ditta, L. Hannon, and J. Prochnow
Male Serial Homicide: The Influence of Cultural and Structural Variables
Homicide Studies, February 1, 2007; 11(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. J. Dubnick and J. B. Justice
Accountability and the Evil of Administrative Ethics
Administration Society, May 1, 2006; 38(2): 236 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]