This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by EGGER, S. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Psychological Profiling

Past, Present, and Future

University of Illinois at Springfield

The development of psychological profiling is examined from its use during World War II to its use today in criminal investigation. This historical analysis includes Dr. James Brussels's work on the Mad Bomber and the "Boston Strangler" cases and then highlights three important dates in the development of psychological profiling: 1972, 1985, and 1994. This first date is when the Federal Bureau of Investigation began its pioneer development in psychological profiling. The second (1985) was psychologist Dr. David Canter's assistance to local police in England in the "Railway Rapist" case. And the third was the establishment of the first academic graduate degree program in investigative psychology by Dr. Canter at the University of Liverpool. Current profiling efforts include a discussion of the assumptions and goals of profiling and how the process of profiling is completed. Various critiques and evaluations of profiling are summarized. The future of profiling discusses issues of profiler licensing, standardizing the process, public versus private profilers, and profiling as an art or a science. New profiling techniques such as greater use of the computer in the profiling process and the decoding of narrative documents are included.

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 15, No. 3, 242-261 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986299015003003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Snook, R. M. Cullen, C. Bennell, P. J. Taylor, and P. Gendreau The Criminal Profiling Illusion: What's Behind the Smoke and Mirrors? Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2008; 35(10): 1257 - 1276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Beauregard and B. Leclerc An Application of the Rational Choice Approach to the Offending Process of Sex Offenders: A Closer Look at the Decision-making Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2007; 19(2): 115 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Snook, J. Eastwood, P. Gendreau, C. Goggin, and R. M. Cullen Taking Stock of Criminal Profiling: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2007; 34(4): 437 - 453. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. DeFronzo, A. Ditta, L. Hannon, and J. Prochnow Male Serial Homicide: The Influence of Cultural and Structural Variables Homicide Studies, February 1, 2007; 11(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Dubnick and J. B. Justice Accountability and the Evil of Administrative Ethics Administration Society, May 1, 2006; 38(2): 236 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]