Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urban, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, No. 4, 454-479 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986203259484

Goal Conflict in the Juvenile Court

The Evolution of Sentencing Practices in the United States

Lynn S. Urban

University of Missouri at St. Louis

Jenna L. Cyr, St.

University of Missouri at St. Louis

Scott H. Decker

University of Missouri at St. Louis

The United States has experienced significant changes in its juvenile justice system since it began in 1899. The focus of juvenile sentencing has shifted from the best interests of the child to more punitive sanctions, which are based on the offense committed. An alternative method for dealing with offenders has arisen in the form of restorative justice, which focuses on balancing the justice response between offender, victim, and community. This article describes the changes in the U.S. juvenile system, highlights the sentencing practices in other countries, and addresses this conflict between punitive and restorative practices.

Key Words: juvenile justice • sentencing • comparative juvenile justice


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?