This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jaquier, V. Articles by Killias, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Cross-National Survey Designs

Equating the National Violence Against Women Survey and Swiss International Violence Against Women Survey

University of Lausanne, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Switzerland

Bonnie S. Fisher

University of Cincinnati, Ohio

Martin Killias

University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Valid and reliable cross-national estimates of rape are needed to more fully understand the extent and nature of these victimizations. Methodological issues that compromise the integrity of cross-national comparisons of self-report survey data have been identified. These issues have neither been systematically addressed, nor is there a consensus as to how to correct them. This article examines the effects that the definition and operationalization of rape have on completed and attempted rape estimates from the National Violence Against Women Survey in the United States and the Swiss component of the International Violence Against Women Survey. Survey design issues related to operationalizing the victim-offender relationship and its effect on rape estimates are discussed. Cross-national rape estimates with and without addressing the comparability issues are presented. The implications for engaging in comparative rape research are also discussed.

Key Words: rape • cross-national • survey methodology • International Violence Against Women Survey • National Violence Against Women Survey

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?