Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sung, H.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Belenko, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Diversion Experiment to Policy Movement

A Case Study of Prosecutorial Innovation

Hung-En Sung

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York

Steven Belenko

Temple University, Pennsylvania, PA

Drug control in the United States has historically been based on a penal approach and led by federal legislations and initiatives. This top-down, punitive approach to the drug problem is still prevalent in American drug policy making. The authors present a case study of a bottom-up policy initiative to remedicalize the processing of addicted offenders. Past prosecutorial experiments often failed because of flawed understandings, unrealistic expectations, and lack of sustained public support. This article considers a New York–based, prosecutor-led program that diverts repeat felony drug offenders from prison to residential treatment. Through successful recruitment of political allies, continuous rejuvenation of the program, emphasis on research and evaluation, and maintenance of ideological vagueness, the Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison (DTAP) program has yielded positive results, been replicated in other jurisdictions, and prompted Congress to entertain federal DTAP legislation. The history of DTAP is summarized, and lessons for future innovations are discussed.

Key Words: coerced treatment • drug abuse • diversion program • prosecution • alternative to incarceration

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 22, No. 3, 220-240 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986206292368
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?