This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Damphousse, K. R. Articles by Shields, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Morning After

Assessing the Effect of Major Terrorism Events on Prosecution Strategies and Outcomes

University of Oklahoma, Norman

Chris Shields

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

A major terrorism event has several important consequences for officials involved in the investigation and prosecution of terrorist activities. Such events are likely to bring increased scrutiny by both public policy officials and the media. The article uses data from the American Terrorism Study to compare the period before and after two of the most dramatic terrorist events on U.S. soil: the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9/11 attacks. The results suggest that whether intentional or not, major terrorism events result in the government's pursuing cases that are generally less serious and less complicated, and those cases are treated much more like "traditional" crimes by the prosecution. Following the aftermath of a major event, terrorist defendants are more likely to behave like traditional offenders and are less likely to be convicted as a result of a trial than are terrorists who are indicted before major events.

Key Words: terrorism • sentencing • 9/11 • Oklahoma City • prosecution

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 23, No. 2, 174-194 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986207301362


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Bradley-Engen, K. R. Damphousse, and B. L. Smith Punishing Terrorists: A Re-Examination of U.S. Federal Sentencing in the Postguidelines Era International Criminal Justice Review, December 1, 2009; 19(4): 433 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Wilkins Newman and N.-Q. D. Brown Historical Overview and Perceptions of Racial and Terrorist Profiling in an Era of Homeland Security: A Research Note Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2009; 20(3): 359 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]