This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Stewart, E. A. Articles by Brunson, R. K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Lessons of the Street Code

Policy Implications for Reducing Violent Victimization Among Disadvantaged Citizens

Florida State University, Tallahassee, estewart2{at}fsu.edu

Christopher J. Schreck

Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

Rod K. Brunson

Southern Illinois University, Carbondale

Elijah Anderson argued that adoption of the street code should reduce victimization risk for individuals who have to navigate disadvantaged, high-crime neighborhoods. In a recent article, Stewart, Schreck, and Simons (2006) examined whether adopting the street code decreased violent victimization, as Anderson suggested. Stewart et al. found no support for the idea that adopting the street code reduces victimization. Instead, they found that individuals who adopt the street code have higher levels of victimization. In addition, the results highlighted that the street code is related to both violent offending and violent victimization. In this article, the authors focus on the policy implications of Anderson's "code of the street" thesis, violent victimization, and offending. They argue that improving police—citizen interactions may be a starting point for restoring legitimacy in the police and criminal justice system, which may in turn reduce violence in street code—dominated areas.

Key Words: street code • violence • race • crime prevention policy

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?