This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kopel, D. B. Articles by Blackman, P. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

To Heller and Back

Independence Institute, Golden, Colorado

Paul H. Blackman

Independence Institute, Golden, Colorado

Extensive legal research confirmed a Standard Model of the Second Amendment: the Founders' intended to recognize and protect a preexisting individual right to own and use firearms for self-defense. Although most gun laws will remain constitutional, despite their irrelevance to crime control, the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller invalidated the nation's most restrictive law, which had banned the possession of handguns and had banned the use of any firearm for home protection. It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court will "incorporate" the Second Amendment in the Fourteenth Amendment so that it limits excessively restrictive state and local laws as well. Criminologically, Heller will probably lead to an increase in gun use against home invasions and a possible decrease of such invasions. Unfortunately, specific data about home invasions are not collected, so the results may be impossible to measure.

Key Words: Second Amendment • Supreme Court • handguns • firearms • protection • self-defense • home invasion • District of Columbia • gun control

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 25, No. 1, 106-112 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986208329694


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?