This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Davis, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Psychological Versus Sociological Explanations for Delinquent Conduct and Gang Formation

Sociological and psychological factors are frequently used to explain juvenile delinquency and the emergence and persistence of juvenile gangs. Sociological theories, such as social control, containment, differential association, anomie, and labeling each reflect different levels of predictive utility relative to delinquent conduct. Psychological theories, such as developmental theory, stages of moral development, social learning, and psychodynamic theories are frequently invoked to account for juvenile offending behavior. A survey of literature discloses that both psychological and sociological factors are often employed simultaneously to explain juvenile gangs, since the interface between these two general classes of theory is invariably intertwined. It is suggested that using theoretical strategies from several disciplines simultaneously in the creation of synthesized theoretical schemes to account for delinquent conduct and gang formation, including biological variables, has greater predictive utility as opposed to using single-discipline explanations.

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 81-93 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/104398629300900202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?