This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wright, E. M. Articles by Van Voorhis, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders

The Importance of Gender-Responsive Needs

University of Cincinnati, Ohio

Emily J. Salisbury

Portland State University, Oregon

Patricia Van Voorhis

University of Cincinnati, Ohio, Patricia.VanVoorshis{at}uc.edu

The needs of women offenders may be qualitatively different than the needs of male offenders. The "pathways" and "gender-responsive" perspectives of female offending have recently garnered attention in both practitioner and scholarly arenas. The pathways perspective focuses attention on the co-occurrence and effects of trauma, substance abuse, dysfunctional relationships, and mental illness on female offending, while the gender-responsive perspective also suggests that problems related to parenting, childcare, and self-concept issues are important needs of women offenders. Few studies have examined whether or not these are risk factors for poor prison adjustment. With a sample of 272 incarcerated women offenders in Missouri, we examine how each gender-responsive need is related to six- and twelve-month prison misconducts, and whether the inclusion of such needs to traditional static custody classification items increases the predictive validity of such tools. Results suggest that women offenders do, in fact, display gender-responsive risk factors in prison.

Key Words: correctional classification • criminogenic needs • gender-responsive • needs • risk factors • women offenders

References

• Aguilar, R.J., & Nightingale, N.N. (1994). The impact of specific battering experiences on the self-esteem of abused women. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 35-45.[CrossRef]
• American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
• Andrews, D.A. (1983). Assessment of outcome in correctional samples. In M. J. Lambert, E. R. Christensen, & S. S. DeJulio (Eds.), Assessment of psychotherapy outcome (pp. 160-201). New York: John Wiley.
• Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of Service Inventory—Revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
• Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
• Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R.D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.[Abstract]
• Austin, J., Bruce, M.A., Carroll, L., McCall, P.L., & Richards, S.C. (2001). The use of incarceration in the United States: American Society of Criminology National Policy Committee. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 10, 17-41.
• Avison, W., Turner, R., & Noh, S. (1986). Screening for problem parenting: Preliminary evidence on a promising instrument. Child Abuse & Neglect, 10, 157-170.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48-71.[Abstract]
• Benda, B.B. (2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 325-342.[Abstract]
• Blanchette, K. (1996). The relationship between criminal history, mental disorder, and recidivism among federally sentenced female offenders. Unpublished master's thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
• Blanchette, K., & Motiuk, L.L. (1995, June). Female offender risk assessment: The case management strategies approach. Poster session presented at the Annual Convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
• Blume, S.B. (1990). Chemical dependency in women: Important issues. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 16, 297-307.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Bonta, J., Pang, B., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (1995). Predictors of recidivism among incarcerated female offenders. The Prison Journal, 75, 277-294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Brennan, T. (1998). Institutional classification of females: Problems and some proposals for reform. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 179-204). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
• Brennan, T., & Austin, J. (1997). Women in jail: Classification issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
• Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., & Oliver, W. (2006). COMPAS: Technical manual and psychometric report Version 5.0. Traverse City, MI: Northpointe Institute.
• Brown, S.L., & Motiuk, L.L. (2005). The Dynamic Factor Identification and Analysis (DFIA) component of the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process: A meta-analytic, psychometric, and consultative review (Research Report R-164). Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
• Browne, A., Miller, B., & Maguin, E. (1999). Prevalence and severity of lifetime physical and sexual victimization among incarcerated women. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 301-322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Special report: Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Special report: Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
• Carp, S.V., & Schade, L. (1992, August). Tailoring facility programming to suit female offender's needs. Corrections Today, 154-158.
• Cascardi, M., & O'Leary, K.D. (1992). Depressive symptomatology, self-esteem, and self-blame in battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 249-259.[CrossRef]
• Case, P., & Fasenfest, D. (2004). Expectations for opportunities following prison education: A discussion of race and gender. Journal of Correctional Education, 55, 24-39.
• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1999 ). Substance abuse treatment for women offenders: Guide to promising practices. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• Chandler, S.M., & Kassebaum, G. (1994). Drug-alcohol dependence of women prisoners in Hawaii. Affilia, 9, 157-170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2000a). What to do about girls? Thinking about programs for young women. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 139-170). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2000b). Women in the criminal justice system: Gender matters. In P. Modley (Ed.), Annual review of topics in community corrections: Responding to women offenders in the community (pp. 7-10). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Clements, C.M., Ogle, R., & Sabourin, C.M. (2005). Perceived control and emotional status in abusive college student relationships: An exploration of gender differences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1058-1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Clements, C.M., Sabourin, C.M., & Spiby, L. (2004). Dysphoria and hopelessness following battering: The role of perceived control, coping, and self-esteem. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 25-36.[CrossRef]
• Covington, S. (1998). The relational theory of women's psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 113-128). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
• Covington, S. (2000). Helping women to recover: Creating gender-specific treatment for substance-abusing women and girls in community corrections. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 171-233). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
• Covington, S.S., & Bloom, B.E. (2007). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. In E. Leeder (Ed.), Inside and out: Women, prison, and therapy (pp. 9-34). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
• Crowley, J.D., & Dill, D. (1992). The Silencing the Self Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97-106.[CrossRef]
• Daly, K. (1992). Women's pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2, 11-52.
• Daly, K. (1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Elliott, D.E., Bjelajac, P., Fallot, R.D., Markoff, L.S., & Reed, B.G. (2005). Trauma-informed or trauma denied: Principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 461-477.[CrossRef]
• Fischer, J., Spann, L., & Crawford, D. (1991). Measuring codependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 8, 87-99.[CrossRef]
• Fogel, C.I., & Martin, S.L. (1992). The mental health of incarcerated women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 14, 30-47.[Free Full Text]
• Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-607.[CrossRef]
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Green, B., Miranda, J., Daroowalla, A., & Siddique, J. (2005). Trauma exposure, mental health functioning, and program needs of women in jail. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 133-151.[Abstract]
• Greene, S., Haney, C., & Hurtado, A. (2000). Cycles of pain: Risk factors in the lives of incarcerated mothers and their children. The Prison Journal, 80, 3-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hardyman, P.L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
• Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2003). The needs of women offenders: Implications for correctional programming. Women & Criminal Justice, 14, 137-160.[CrossRef]
• Islam-Zwart, K.A., & Vik, P.W. (2004). Female adjustment to incarceration as influenced by sexual assault history. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 521-541.[Abstract]
• Jordan, B.K., Schlenger, W.E., Fairbank, J.A., & Caddell, J.M. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women II. Convicted women felons entering prison. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 513-519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kaplan, A.G. (1984). The "self in relation": Implications for depression in women (Publication No. 14). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.
• Koons, B.A., Burrow, J.D., Morash, M., & Bynum, T. (1997). Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 512-532.[Abstract]
• Langan, N.P., & Pelissier, B. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291-301.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Law, M.A., Sullivan, S.M., & Goggin, C. (in press). Security classification measures for female offenders and predictors of female criminal conduct: A literature review. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
• Lerner, K., Arling, G., & Baird, C. (1986). Client management classification: Strategies for case supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 254-271.[Abstract]
• Lindquist, C.H., & Lindquist, C.A. (1997). Gender differences in distress: Mental health consequences of environmental stress among jail inmates. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 503-523.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Loucks, A., & Zamble, E. (1999). Predictors of recidivism in serious female offenders: Canada searches for predictors common to both men and women. Corrections Today, 61, 26-31.
• McClellan, D.S., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B.M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-476.[Abstract]
• Miller, J.B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
• Miller, J.B., & Stiver, I.P. (1998). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and life. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
• Morash, M., Bynum, T.S., & Koons, B.A. (1998). Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
• Mumola, C. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children (No. 182335). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
• Orava, T.A., McLeod, P.J., & Sharpe, D. (1996). Perceptions of control, depressive symptomatology, and self-esteem of women in transition from abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 167-186.[CrossRef]
• Owen, B. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a woman's prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Owen, B., & Bloom, B. (1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. The Prison Journal, 75, 165-185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Peters, R.H., Strozier, A.L., Murrin, M.R., & Kearns, W.D. (1997). Treatment of substance abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14, 339-349.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Prendergast, M., Wellisch, J., & Falkin, G. (1995). Assessment of services for substance-abusing women offenders and correctional settings. The Prison Journal, 75, 240-256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Reisig, M.D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384-405.[CrossRef]
• Resick, P.A. (1993). The psychological impact of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 223-255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Rettinger, L.J. (1998). A recidivism follow-up study investigating risk and need within a sample of provincially sentenced women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
• Richie, B.E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of Black battered women. New York: Routledge.
• Roehling, P., & Gaumond, E. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Codependent Questionnaire. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14, 85-95.[CrossRef]
• Rosenberg, M. (1979). The concept of self. New York: Basic Books.
• Rumgay, J. (2004). Scripts for safer survival: Pathways out of female crime. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 405-419.[CrossRef]
• Salisbury, E.J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2007, March). Gendered pathways: An investigation of women offenders' unique paths to crime. Paper resented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Seattle, WA.
• Salisbury, E.J., Van Voorhis, P., & Spiropoulos, G.V. (in press). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency.
• Schram, P.J., & Morash, M. (2002). Evaluation of a life skills program for women inmates in Michigan. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 47-70.
• Sherer, M., Maddus, J., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
• Sheridan, J.J. (1996). Inmates may be parents, too. Corrections Today, 58, 100-103.
• Simourd, L., & Andrews, D.A. (1994). Correlates of delinquency: A look at gender differences. Forum on Corrections Research, 6, 26-31.
• Singer, M.I., Bussey, J., Song, L.Y., & Lunghofer, L. (1995). The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Social Work, 40, 103-113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. ( 1990). Creating choices: The report of the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General Canada.
• Teplin, L.A., Abram, K.M., & McClelland, G.M. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 505-512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
• Van Voorhis, P. (2004). An overview of offender classification systems. In P. Van Voorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (5th ed., pp. 133-160). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
• Van Voorhis, P., & Presser, L. (2001). Classification of women offenders: A national assessment of current practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
• Warren, J., Hurt, S., Booker Loper, A., & Chauhan, P. (2004). Exploring prison adjustment among female inmates: Issues of measurement and prediction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 624-645.[Abstract]
• Williams, S.L., & Mickelson, K.D. (2004). The nexus of domestic violence and poverty. Violence Against Women, 10, 283-293.[Abstract]
• Wormith, J.S. (1984). Attitude and behavior change of correctional clientele: A three year follow-up. Criminology, 23, 326-348.
• Zlotnick, C., Johnson, D.M., & Kohn, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence and long-term psychosocial functioning in a national sample of American women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 262-275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 23, No. 4, 310-340 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986207309595


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Q. Emeka and J. R. Sorensen Female Juvenile Risk: Is There a Need for Gendered Assessment Instruments? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2009; 7(4): 313 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. J. Salisbury and P. Van Voorhis Gendered Pathways: A Quantitative Investigation of Women Probationers' Paths to Incarceration Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2009; 36(6): 541 - 566. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wright, E. M. Articles by Van Voorhis, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?