This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Levenson, J. S. Articles by Cotter, L. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration

Lynn University

Leo P. Cotter

The S.H.A.R.E. Program

The purpose of this study is to better understand the positive and negative, intended and unintended, consequences of community notification on sex offenders’ rehabilitation and reintegration. A sample of 183 convicted male sex offenders from Florida completed the survey. Overall, about one third of participants had experienced dire events, such as the loss of a job or home, threats or harassment, or property damage. Physical assaultwas a relatively rare occurrence. The majority identified negative effects, such as stress, isolation, loss of relationships, fear, shame, embarrassment, and hopelessness. Some participants noted positive effects of Megan’s Law, including motivation to prevent reoffense and increased honesty with friends and family. Fewsex offenders believed that communities are safer because of Megan’s Law, and more than half reported that the information posted about them on Florida’s Internet registry was incorrect. Implications for practice and policy are discussed.

Key Words: sex offender • community notification • registration • Megan’s Law • offender reintegration • offender rehabilitation

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 21, No. 1, 49-66 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986204271676


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Schiavone and E. L. Jeglic Public Perception of Sex Offender Social Policies and the Impact on Sex Offenders Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2009; 53(6): 679 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Button, M. DeMichele, and B. K. Payne Using Electronic Monitoring to Supervise Sex Offenders: Legislative Patterns and Implications for Community Corrections Officers Criminal Justice Policy Review, December 1, 2009; 20(4): 414 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. J. Letourneau, D. Bandyopadhyay, D. Sinha, and K. Armstrong Effects of Sex Offender Registration Policies on Juvenile Justice Decision Making Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2009; 21(2): 149 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. Willis and R. C. Grace Assessment of Community Reintegration Planning for Sex Offenders: Poor Planning Predicts Recidivism Criminal Justice and Behavior, May 1, 2009; 36(5): 494 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Chajewski and C. C. Mercado An Evaluation of Sex Offender Residency Restriction Functioning in Town, County, and City-Wide Jurisdictions Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2009; 20(1): 44 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Zgoba, J. Levenson, and T. McKee Examining the Impact of Sex Offender Residence Restrictions on Housing Availability Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2009; 20(1): 91 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. P. Robbers Lifers on the Outside: Sex Offenders and Disintegrative Shaming Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2009; 53(1): 5 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Anderson and L. L. Sample Public Awareness and Action Resulting From Sex Offender Community Notification Laws Criminal Justice Policy Review, December 1, 2008; 19(4): 371 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Vandiver, K. C. Dial, and R. M. Worley A Qualitative Assessment of Registered Female Sex Offenders: Judicial Processing Experiences and Perceived Effects of a Public Registry Criminal Justice Review, June 1, 2008; 33(2): 177 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. C. Mercado, S. Alvarez, and J. Levenson The Impact of Specialized Sex Offender Legislation on Community Reentry Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 188 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Sample and C. Kadleck Sex Offender Laws: Legislators' Accounts of the Need for Policy Criminal Justice Policy Review, March 1, 2008; 19(1): 40 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. B. Burchfield and W. Mingus Not in My Neighborhood: Assessing Registered Sex Offenders' Experiences With Local Social Capital and Social Control Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 35(3): 356 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. N. Brannon, J. S. Levenson, T. Fortney, and J. N. Baker Attitudes About Community Notification: A Comparison of Sexual Offenders and the Non-offending Public Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 369 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Tewksbury and M. B. Lees Perceptions of Punishment: How Registered Sex Offenders View Registries Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2007; 53(3): 380 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Levenson and D. A. D'Amora Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence: The Emperor's New Clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2007; 18(2): 168 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]