Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esbensen, F.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Weiher, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 94-116 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/104398629300900203

Gang and Non-Gang Youth: Differences in Explanatory Factors

Finn-Aage Esbensen

David Huizinga

Anne W. Weiher

An apparently common assumption about juvenile gangs is that they are composed of individuals who are substantially different from other youth that are not gang members. Little empirical evidence exists to support such an assumption. This can, in part, be attributed to the fact that most knowledge about gangs has been derived from data gathered by police gang units or from observational or case studies. Very little information has been derived from surveys or interviews with a general sample of youth. In this paper, data from the Denver Youth Survey, a longitudinal study of families, are used to examine the characteristics of gang members and to explore the extent to which gang members differ from non-gang members on key theoretical variables. Findings suggest that while gang members differ from non-offending youth on a number of social psychological variables, they do not differ from other youth involved in serious "street" level offending.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
G. Tita and G. Ridgeway
The Impact of Gang Formation on Local Patterns of Crime
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2007; 44(2): 208 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
V. J. Webb, C. M. Katz, and S. H. Decker
Assessing the Validity of Self-Reports by Gang Members: Results From the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2006; 52(2): 232 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
J. C. Howell and A. Egley Jr.
Moving Risk Factors into Developmental Theories of Gang Membership
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2005; 3(4): 334 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
P. J. Schram and L. K. Gaines
Examining Delinquent Nongang Members and Delinquent Gang Members: A Comparison of Juvenile Probationers at Intake and Outcomes
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2005; 3(2): 99 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
F.-A. Esbensen and F. M. Weerman
Youth Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups in the United States and the Netherlands: A Cross-National Comparison
European Journal of Criminology, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 5 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
R. L. Dukes and J. A. Stein
Gender and Gang Membership: A Contrast of Rural and Urban Youth on Attitudes and Behavior
Youth Society, June 1, 2003; 34(4): 415 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
K. A. Yoder, L. B. Whitbeck, and D. R. Hoyt
Gang Involvement and Membership among Homeless and Runaway Youth
Youth Society, June 1, 2003; 34(4): 441 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
X. LI, B. STANTON, R. PACK, C. HARRIS, L. COTTRELL, and J. BURNS
Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Gang Involvement among Urban African American Adolescents
Youth Society, December 1, 2002; 34(2): 172 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
F.-A. ESBENSEN, E. P. DESCHENES, and L. T. WINFREE Jr.
Differences between Gang Girls and Gang Boys: Results from a Multisite Survey
Youth Society, September 1, 1999; 31(1): 27 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
K. G. HILL, J. C. HOWELL, J. D. HAWKINS, and S. R. BATTIN-PEARSON
Childhood Risk Factors for Adolescent Gang Membership: Results from the Seattle Social Development Project
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, August 1, 1999; 36(3): 300 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
F.-A. ESBENSEN and D. W. OSGOOD
Gang Resistance Education and Training (Great): Results from the National Evaluation
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 1999; 36(2): 194 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
J. MILLER
Gender and Victimization Risk among Young Women in Gangs
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 1998; 35(4): 429 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
K. M. THOMPSON and R. BRAATEN-ANTRIM
Youth Maltreatment and Gang Involvement
J Interpers Violence, June 1, 1998; 13(3): 328 - 345.
[Abstract]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
R. L. DUKES, R. O. MARTINEZ, and J. A. STEIN
Precursors and Consequences of Membership in Youth Gangs
Youth Society, December 1, 1997; 29(2): 139 - 165.
[Abstract]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
L. T. Winfree JR, F.-A. Esbensen, and D. W. Osgood
Evaluating a School-Based Gang-Prevention Program: A Theoretical Perspective
Eval Rev, April 1, 1996; 20(2): 181 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]